Proof by Certificate of Marriage
In accordance with Art. 94 of the Revised Family code, marriage is proved by producing the certificate of marriage drawn up at the time or after the celebration of the marriage in accordance with the Law. Even though there is no definition of the tem, a certificate of marriage is that which is issued by the officer of Civil status who is authorized to record the marriage in accordance with Art.28 of the code.
It may be recalled from the previous discussion made under chapter two that certificate of
marriage shall be issued for all from of marriage up on their registration by officer of Civil
status or in has default by the competent organ authorized for this
purpose Hence, the certificate of
marriage, inter alia, indicates the form of marriage under which the
celebration was carried out. In other words, The certificate of marriage as a
primary documentary evidence proves the type of the celebration of the
marriage, the fact that indicates the existence of a marriage.
Presently the most
widely established practice
in most parts of the country is
that the officer of a particular municipality instead of
officer of civil status
issues certificate of marriage only when
the marriage is celebrated in accordance with the formalities of civil
marriage . Registration of and issuance of certificate marriage for other forms of marriage
are not a common practice . Further more courts usually accept
marriage licenses issued by religious institutions and written
documents of customary marriages
as a proof for the existence of a valid marriage .
Proof by Possession of status
Proof
by marriage applicable in default of certificate of marriage. As is stated
under Art. 95 of the
R.F.C when it is difficult to prove
marriage by producing the certificate of marriage due to non
registration or if any loss
of such register
marriage shall be proved by the possession of status of spouse .
Art.
96- Possession of status (1)
Definition
A man
and a woman are deemed to have
the possession of status of
spouses when they mutually
consider them selves and live
as spouses and
when they are considered
and treated as such by their
family and the community .
From
the reading of the above cited
provisions two essential elements of possession of
status may be pointed
out from the definition . These elements are:-
·
The
fact that a man and a woman mutually
consider themselves and live
as spouses and;
· The
fact that they are
considered and treated treated
as such by their
family and the community .
There for the existence of
possession of status would be established only
when both of the
above of the above elements are proved
by reliable evidence. In proving
the first element worth noting is the fact that unilateral consideration of the status does not
amount to its existence .
Where a person alleging the existence
of marriage proves the possession
of status spouse in
accordance with the preceding provisions the court may
presume that marriage has been
concluded .
Nevertheless, it should be borne in mind that this second mode of proof
of marriage is entirely different from the first mode of proof . the distinction
lies in the point that celebration of marriage is not indicated as one
of the requirements to prove marriage by possession of status which is the case
for the first mode
of proof. Furthermore despite
the silence of he revised
family code as to the
nature our type of evidence in proof
of existence pf the status . Art
.700 (1)
of the civil code as well as
Art. 109 (1) &
(2) of the family code of the
SNNP regional states
provide for proof
by producing four witnesses who were
present at the conclusion of the marriage . The presumption of the status so established may be
rebutted by producing any kind
of reliable evidence But
under the civil code
and that of SNNP, the possession of the status established
may be contested
by producing four
witnesses .
The
third mode of proof
which is applicable only
under the civil code is
proof by act of notoriety . In
terms of its significance this
mode of proof is the last mode resorted ot in default of the
aforementioned modes of proof .
This is clearly provided under Art.701 & 702 of the
code that in default of possession of status or where it is contested , the existence
of the marriage is proved by an act
of notoriety approved by the court where such
mode of proof is authorized by the court .
Comments
Post a Comment